{"id":6836,"date":"2026-03-22T20:57:55","date_gmt":"2026-03-22T20:57:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lumyna.com.br\/scarpinella2026\/?page_id=6836"},"modified":"2026-04-18T21:31:51","modified_gmt":"2026-04-18T21:31:51","slug":"artigos","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/lumyna.com.br\/scarpinella2026\/artigos\/","title":{"rendered":"Artigos"},"content":{"rendered":"[vc_row type=”full_width_background” full_screen_row_position=”middle” column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” scene_position=”center” top_padding=”30″ bottom_padding=”0″ text_color=”dark” text_align=”left” row_border_radius=”none” row_border_radius_applies=”bg” row_position_desktop=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” overlay_strength=”0.3″ gradient_direction=”left_to_right” shape_divider_position=”bottom” bg_image_animation=”none” gradient_type=”default” shape_type=””][vc_column column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” column_position=”default” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/4″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][\/vc_column][vc_column column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” column_position=”default” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/2″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][split_line_heading line_reveal_by_space_text_effect=”default” font_style=”h4″ text_color=”#333333″ stagger_animation=”true” content_alignment=”center” mobile_content_alignment=”inherit” animation_type=”line-reveal-by-space” link_target=”_self” text_content=”Artigos publicados pelo Prof. Cassio” text_direction=”default”][\/split_line_heading][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”extra-color-1″ animate=”yes”][\/vc_column][vc_column column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” column_position=”default” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/4″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row type=”full_width_background” full_screen_row_position=”middle” column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” scene_position=”center” top_padding=”40″ bottom_padding=”0″ text_color=”dark” text_align=”left” row_border_radius=”none” row_border_radius_applies=”bg” row_position_desktop=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” overlay_strength=”0.3″ gradient_direction=”left_to_right” shape_divider_position=”bottom” bg_image_animation=”none” gradient_type=”default” shape_type=””][vc_column column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” column_position=”default” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/4″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid” column_padding_type=”default” content_layout=”default” gradient_type=”default”][nectar_cta btn_style=”basic” heading_tag=”p” link_type=”regular” button_color=”default” button_color_hover=”#C42B2A” text_color=”#333333″ text_color_hover=”#FFFFFF” button_border_color=”#F5F5F5″ button_border_color_hover=”#FFFFFF” button_border_thickness=”1px” alignment=”left” alignment_tablet=”default” alignment_phone=”default” icon_gap=”15″ backdrop_filter=”blur” display=”block” display_tablet=”inherit” display_phone=”inherit” icon_family=”fontawesome” icon_fontawesome=”fa fa-book” link_text=”Livros” url=”#” padding_top=”10″ padding_bottom=”10″ margin_bottom=”-1″ font_size_desktop=”15″ padding_left=”10″][nectar_cta btn_style=”basic” heading_tag=”p” link_type=”regular” button_color=”default” button_color_hover=”#C42B2A” text_color=”#333333″ text_color_hover=”#FFFFFF” button_border_color=”#F5F5F5″ button_border_color_hover=”#FFFFFF” button_border_thickness=”1px” alignment=”left” alignment_tablet=”default” alignment_phone=”default” icon_gap=”15″ backdrop_filter=”blur” display=”block” display_tablet=”inherit” display_phone=”inherit” icon_family=”fontawesome” icon_fontawesome=”fa fa-users” link_text=”Livros em coautoria” url=”#” padding_top=”10″ padding_bottom=”10″ padding_left=”8″ margin_bottom=”-1″ font_size_desktop=”15px”][nectar_cta btn_style=”basic” heading_tag=”p” link_type=”regular” button_color=”default” button_color_hover=”#C42B2A” text_color=”#333333″ text_color_hover=”#FFFFFF” button_border_color=”#F5F5F5″ button_border_color_hover=”#FFFFFF” button_border_thickness=”1px” alignment=”left” alignment_tablet=”default” alignment_phone=”default” icon_gap=”15″ backdrop_filter=”blur” display=”block” display_tablet=”inherit” display_phone=”inherit” icon_family=”fontawesome” icon_fontawesome=”fa fa-graduation-cap” link_text=”Apostilas” url=”#” padding_top=”10″ padding_bottom=”10″ padding_left=”6″ margin_bottom=”-1″ font_size_desktop=”15px”][nectar_cta btn_style=”basic” heading_tag=”p” link_type=”regular” button_color=”extra-color-1″ button_color_hover=”#C42B2A” text_color=”#FFFFFF” text_color_hover=”#FFFFFF” button_border_color=”#F5F5F5″ button_border_color_hover=”#FFFFFF” button_border_thickness=”1px” alignment=”left” alignment_tablet=”default” alignment_phone=”default” icon_gap=”15″ backdrop_filter=”blur” display=”block” display_tablet=”inherit” display_phone=”inherit” icon_family=”fontawesome” icon_fontawesome=”fa fa-file-text-o” link_text=”Artigos” url=”#” padding_top=”10″ padding_bottom=”10″ padding_left=”12″ margin_bottom=”-1″ font_size_desktop=”15px”][nectar_cta btn_style=”basic” heading_tag=”p” link_type=”regular” button_color=”default” button_color_hover=”#C42B2A” text_color=”#333333″ text_color_hover=”#FFFFFF” button_border_color=”#F5F5F5″ button_border_color_hover=”#FFFFFF” button_border_thickness=”1px” alignment=”left” alignment_tablet=”default” alignment_phone=”default” icon_gap=”15″ backdrop_filter=”blur” display=”block” display_tablet=”inherit” display_phone=”inherit” icon_family=”fontawesome” icon_fontawesome=”fa fa-gavel” link_text=”Pareceres e Trabalhos Forenses” url=”#” padding_top=”10″ padding_bottom=”10″ padding_left=”10″ margin_bottom=”-1″ font_size_desktop=”15px”][nectar_cta btn_style=”basic” heading_tag=”p” link_type=”regular” button_color=”default” button_color_hover=”#C42B2A” text_color=”#333333″ text_color_hover=”#FFFFFF” button_border_color=”#F5F5F5″ button_border_color_hover=”#FFFFFF” button_border_thickness=”1px” alignment=”left” alignment_tablet=”default” alignment_phone=”default” icon_gap=”20″ backdrop_filter=”blur” display=”block” display_tablet=”inherit” display_phone=”inherit” icon_family=”fontawesome” icon_fontawesome=”fa fa-globe” link_text=”Tradu\u00e7\u00f5es” url=”#” padding_top=”10″ padding_bottom=”10″ padding_left=”10″ margin_bottom=”-1″ font_size_desktop=”15px”][nectar_cta btn_style=”basic” heading_tag=”p” link_type=”regular” button_color=”default” button_color_hover=”#C42B2A” text_color=”#333333″ text_color_hover=”#FFFFFF” button_border_color=”#F5F5F5″ button_border_color_hover=”#FFFFFF” button_border_thickness=”1px” alignment=”left” alignment_tablet=”default” alignment_phone=”default” icon_gap=”15″ display=”block” display_tablet=”inherit” display_phone=”inherit” icon_family=”fontawesome” icon_fontawesome=”fa fa-balance-scale” link_text=”Anteprojeto de Lei” url=”#” padding_top=”10″ padding_bottom=”10″ padding_left=”7″ margin_bottom=”-1″ font_size_desktop=”15px”][nectar_cta btn_style=”basic” heading_tag=”p” link_type=”regular” button_color=”default” button_color_hover=”#C42B2A” text_color=”#333333″ text_color_hover=”#FFFFFF” button_border_color=”#F5F5F5″ button_border_color_hover=”#FFFFFF” button_border_thickness=”1px” alignment=”left” alignment_tablet=”default” alignment_phone=”default” icon_gap=”20″ backdrop_filter=”blur” display=”block” display_tablet=”inherit” display_phone=”inherit” icon_family=”fontawesome” link_text=”Audiolivros” url=”#” padding_top=”10″ padding_bottom=”10″ padding_left=”10″ margin_bottom=”-1″ icon_fontawesome=”fa fa-file-audio-o” font_size_desktop=”15px”][nectar_cta btn_style=”basic” heading_tag=”p” link_type=”regular” button_color=”default” button_color_hover=”#C42B2A” text_color=”#333333″ text_color_hover=”#FFFFFF” button_border_color=”#F5F5F5″ button_border_color_hover=”#FFFFFF” button_border_thickness=”1px” alignment=”left” alignment_tablet=”default” alignment_phone=”default” icon_gap=”20″ backdrop_filter=”blur” display=”block” display_tablet=”inherit” display_phone=”inherit” icon_family=”fontawesome” icon_fontawesome=”fa fa-bookmark-o” link_text=”Pref\u00e1cios e Apresenta\u00e7\u00f5es de Obras Jur\u00eddicas” url=”#” padding_top=”10″ padding_bottom=”10″ padding_left=”10″ margin_bottom=”-1″ font_size_desktop=”15px”][nectar_cta btn_style=”basic” heading_tag=”p” link_type=”regular” button_color=”default” button_color_hover=”#C42B2A” text_color=”#333333″ text_color_hover=”#FFFFFF” button_border_color=”#F5F5F5″ button_border_color_hover=”#FFFFFF” button_border_thickness=”1px” alignment=”left” alignment_tablet=”default” alignment_phone=”default” icon_gap=”20″ backdrop_filter=”blur” display=”block” display_tablet=”inherit” display_phone=”inherit” icon_family=”fontawesome” icon_fontawesome=”fa fa-file-powerpoint-o” link_text=”Apresenta\u00e7\u00f5es” url=”#” padding_top=”10″ padding_bottom=”10″ padding_left=”10″ font_size_desktop=”15px”][\/vc_column][vc_column column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” column_position=”default” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”3\/4″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid” column_padding_type=”default” content_layout=”default” gradient_type=”default”][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

Opini\u00f3n<\/em>: Siempre es tiempo para dedicarse a estudiar y reflexionar sobre el derecho procesal<\/em><\/strong>. Bolet\u00edn de Noticias del Instituto Ibero-americano de Derecho Procesal<\/em>, vol. 1, n. 8, junho de 2024.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

Amicus curiae<\/em>, acesso \u00e0 justi\u00e7a e legitima\u00e7\u00e3o. Revista Iberoamericana de Derecho Procesal<\/em><\/strong>, a\u00f1o 4, vol. 1. Espanha: Instituto Iberoamericano de Derecho Procesal\/Bosch, Enero-Junio 2025, p. 55\/74. ISSN: 2358-7156. D.L: B 11165-2021.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

Dez anos de promulga\u00e7\u00e3o do CPC: impactos e avan\u00e7os<\/strong>. Publicado em Boletim da Associa\u00e7\u00e3o dos Advogados de S\u00e3o Paulo<\/em> n. 3220, 1\u00aa quinzena de agosto de 2025, p. 18\/19.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

Meccanismi di giustizia consensuale nel diritto processuale brasiliano: un\u2019introduzione in chiave comparata. Giustizia consensuale<\/em><\/strong>. Rivista Semestrale<\/em> diretta da Silvana Dalla Bont\u00e0 e Paola Lucarelli, Fasc\u00edculo 2\/2023, Ano III, julho\/setembro de 2023. N\u00e1poles: Editoriale Scientifica, 2023, p. 557\/587. ISSN: 2785-0994.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

Custas judiciais no Estado de S\u00e3o Paulo e o in\u00edcio da etapa de cumprimento de senten\u00e7a<\/strong>. Revista do Instituto dos Advogados de S\u00e3o Paulo<\/em>, vol. 38, ano 23 \u2013 Ago.\/2023-Fev.\/2024. S\u00e3o Paulo: IASP, 2024, p. 133\/141. ISSN: 1415-7683-38.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

Novas tecnologias e o direito processual civil brasileiro<\/strong>. Revista Iberoamericana de Derecho Procesal<\/em>, a\u00f1o 3, vol. 1. Espanha: Instituto Iberoamericano de Derecho Procesal\/Bosch, enero-junio 2024, p. 65\/96. ISSN: 2358-7156. D.L: B 11165-2021.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

Nuevas tecnolog\u00edas y el derecho procesal civil brasile\u00f1o<\/strong>. Revista Uruguaya de Derecho Procesal<\/em>, vol. 2\/2024. <\/em>Montevideo: Fundaci\u00f3n de Cultura Universitaria, 2024, p. 25\/37. ISSN: 3046-4153. Dispon\u00edvel em: https:\/\/revistas.fcu.edu.uy\/index.php\/rudp\/article\/view\/5067\/4461<\/a>.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

Um processualista civil no meio dos meios n\u00e3o jurisdicionais de resolu\u00e7\u00e3o de conflitos<\/strong>. PUC-SP Alternative Dispute Resolution News<\/em>, n. 1\/2024, p. 6\/12. Dispon\u00edvel em: https:\/\/pt.scribd.com\/document\/814111839\/1%C2%AA-Edicao-PUC-SP-ADR-News-Revista<\/a>. Coordena\u00e7\u00e3o cient\u00edfica: Cl\u00e1udio Finkelstein e Claudia Elisabete Schwerz.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

Um processualista civil no meio dos meios n\u00e3o jurisdicionais de resolu\u00e7\u00e3o de conflitos<\/strong>. PUC-SP Alternative Dispute Resolution News<\/em>, n. 1\/2024, p. 6\/12. Dispon\u00edvel em: https:\/\/pt.scribd.com\/document\/814111839\/1%C2%AA-Edicao-PUC-SP-ADR-News-Revista<\/a>. Coordena\u00e7\u00e3o cient\u00edfica: Cl\u00e1udio Finkelstein e Claudia Elisabete Schwerz.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

Pedido de destaque e remessa do processo do plen\u00e1rio virtual para o presencial no STF: prevalecimento do art. 941, \u00a7 1\u00ba, do CPC<\/strong>. Revista Eletr\u00f4nica de Direito Processual: coluna REDP Expresso. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro, 2022. In: https:\/\/www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br\/index.php\/redp\/article\/view\/70076\/43380.<\/a> Em co-autoria com Alexandre Freitas C\u00e2mara. ISSN: 1982-7636.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

ADI 4296 e liminar em mandado de seguran\u00e7a: uma proposta de compreens\u00e3o de seu alcance<\/strong>. Suprema: revista de estudos constitucionais, Bras\u00edlia<\/em>, v. 2, n. 1, p. 157-184, jan.\/jun. 2022. In: https:\/\/suprema.stf.jus.br\/index.php\/suprema\/issue\/view\/3<\/a>.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cRevis\u00e3o da vida toda\u201d: destaque e remessa do processo para o Plen\u00e1rio presencial<\/strong>. In: https:\/\/www.conjur.com.br\/2022-abr-07\/camara-bueno-revisao-vida-toda-quem-votar<\/a> Conjur, 7 de abril de 2022. Em co-autoria com Alexandre Freitas C\u00e2mara.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

Aplicabilidade da t\u00e9cnica de amplia\u00e7\u00e3o do colegiado ao mandado de seguran\u00e7a: coment\u00e1rios ao ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o do REsp 1.868.072\/RS<\/strong>. Revista de Processo<\/em>, vol. 324. S\u00e3o Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, fevereiro de 2022, p. 481\/504. ISSN: 0100-1981; ISBN: 978-65-5991-430-2. Escrito em coautoria com Luciano Tonelli e Ta\u00eds Santos de Ara\u00fajo.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

Din\u00e2mica do direito jurisprudencial no \u00e2mbito do CARF (Conselho Administrativo de Recursos Fiscais): interpreta\u00e7\u00e3o e distin\u00e7\u00e3o a partir de sua S\u00famula 11<\/strong>. Revista de Processo<\/em>, vol. 323. S\u00e3o Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, janeiro de 2022, p. 365\/401. ISSN: 0100-1981.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

Direito jurisprudencial do cpc: um estudo sobre a (des)necessidade de intima\u00e7\u00e3o pessoal para pagamento de multa em obriga\u00e7\u00e3o de fazer<\/strong>. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual<\/em>, vol. 115. Belo Horizonte: F\u00f3rum, jul.\/set. 2021, p. 77\/102. ISSN: 0100-2589.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

Incidente de desconsidera\u00e7\u00e3o da personalidade jur\u00eddica: reflex\u00f5es \u00e0 luz do processo tribut\u00e1rio<\/strong>. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual<\/em>, vol. 112. Belo Horizonte: F\u00f3rum, out.\/dez. 2020, p. 63\/90. ISSN: 1984-4360. DOI: 10.52028\/RBDPro.v21i112.20061OSP.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

Incidente de Assun\u00e7\u00e3o de Compet\u00eancia: reflex\u00f5es sobre seu cabimento, suspens\u00e3o de processos e fungibilidade<\/strong>. Revista de Processo<\/em>, vol. 309. S\u00e3o Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, novembro de 2020, p. 279\/296. ISSN: 0100-1981. ISBN: 9770100198006-00280.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cMandado de seguran\u00e7a e a regra de compet\u00eancia do art. 52, par\u00e1grafo \u00fanico, do CPC\u201d<\/strong>. Revista de Processo<\/em>, vol. 305. S\u00e3o Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, julho de 2020, p. 309\/329. ISSN: 0100-1981. ISBN: 9770100198006-00280.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cOs impactos do novo C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil no mandado de seguran\u00e7a\u201d<\/strong>. Revista de Processo<\/em>, vol. 297. S\u00e3o Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, novembro de 2019, p. 235\/269. ISSN: 0100-1981. ISBN: 9770100198006-00280.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cMandado de seguran\u00e7a, compensa\u00e7\u00e3o tribut\u00e1ria e prova pr\u00e9-constitu\u00edda do ind\u00e9bito: discuss\u00f5es a partir da sistem\u00e1tica dos recursos especiais repetitivos\u201d<\/strong>. Revista de Processo<\/em>, vol. 296. S\u00e3o Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, outubro de 2019, p. 237\/258. ISSN: 0100-1981. ISBN: 9770100198006-00280.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

30 anos do STJ e prequestionamento: uma an\u00e1lise cr\u00edtica do prequestionamento ficto diante do art. 1.025 do CPC.<\/strong> Revista do Advogado. S\u00e3o Paulo: Associa\u00e7\u00e3o dos Advogados, 2019, p. 48\/56.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

Agravo de instrumento contra decis\u00e3o que indefere pedido de homologa\u00e7\u00e3o de acordo entre as partes<\/strong>. Revista Jur\u00eddica da Presid\u00eancia<\/em>, vol. 20, n. 122. Bras\u00edlia: Centro de Estudos Jur\u00eddicos da Presid\u00eancia, Subchefia para Assuntos Jur\u00eddicos da Casa Civil, Presid\u00eancia da Rep\u00fablica, outubro de 2018 a janeiro de 2019, p. 621\/646. ISSN: 2236-3645. (escrito em coautoria com Welder Queiroz dos Santos).<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

Tutela provvisoria nel CPC brasiliano: note per la comparazione con il diritto processuale civile italiano<\/em><\/strong>. Revista de Processo<\/em>, vol. 280. S\u00e3o Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, junho de 2018, p. 171\/183. ISSN: 0100-1981. ISBN: 9770100198006-00280.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

As S\u00famulas 213 e 461 do STJ e a S\u00famula 271 do STF: o mandado de seguran\u00e7a e a compensa\u00e7\u00e3o tribut\u00e1ria<\/strong>. Revista da EMERJ<\/em>, vol. 20, n. 1: edi\u00e7\u00e3o em homenagem ao Professor Jos\u00e9 Carlos Barbosa Moreira. 20 anos da Revista da EMERJ. Rio de Janeiro: Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, janeiro\/abril de 2018, p. 224\/239. ISSN: 1415-4951.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cCoisa julgada em mat\u00e9ria tribut\u00e1ria e o CPC de 2015: considera\u00e7\u00f5es em torno da S\u00famula 239 do STF\u201d<\/strong>. Revista de Processo<\/em> , vol. 276. S\u00e3o Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, fevereiro de 2018, p. 295-330. ISSN: 0100-1981. ISBN: 9770100198006-00276. 88.1. Tamb\u00e9m publicado In: ALVIM, Teresa Arruda; DIDIER JR., Fredie (org.). Doutrinas essenciais Novo Processo Civil: senten\u00e7a e coisa julgada<\/em>, vol. V. 2\u00aa edi\u00e7\u00e3o. S\u00e3o Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2018, p. 591-626. ISBN: 978-85-549-4747-7.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cOs princ\u00edpios constitucionais e o C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil: uma (merecida) homenagem \u00e0 Professora Ada Pellegrini Grinover\u201d<\/strong>. Revista Brasileira de Advocacia<\/em>, ano 2, vol. 7. S\u00e3o Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2017, p. 47-65. ISSN: 2447-9144.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cPenhora on line<\/em> no C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil Brasileiro\u201d<\/strong>. Revista Jur\u00eddica<\/em> da UniFil \u2013 Centro Universit\u00e1rio Filad\u00e9lfia, vol. 14, n. 14. Londrina: UniFil, 2017, p. 13-25. ISSN: 1807-1627.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cA tutela provis\u00f3ria de urg\u00eancia do CPC de 2015 na perspectiva dos diferentes tipos de periculum in mora<\/em> de Calamandrei\u201d<\/strong>. Revista de Processo<\/em>, vol. 269. S\u00e3o Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, julho de 2017, p. 271-290. ISSN 0100-1981. 85.1. Tamb\u00e9m publicado In: ALVIM, Teresa Arruda; DIDIER JR., Fredie (org.). Doutrinas essenciais Novo Processo Civil: tutela provis\u00f3ria<\/em>, vol. III. 2\u00aa edi\u00e7\u00e3o. S\u00e3o Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2018, p. 159-178. ISBN: 978-85-549-4745-3.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cCivil Justice in Brazil<\/em>\u201d<\/strong>. BRICS Law Journal<\/em>, vol. III, issue 4, 2016, p. 6-40 (em coautoria com Teresa Arruda Alvim Wambier). DOI: 10.21684\/2412-2343-2016-3-4-6-40. Acess\u00edvel em https:\/\/ssrn.com\/author=2657645<\/a>.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cEsecuzione e ricerca delle cose da pignorare in Brasile<\/em>\u201d<\/strong>. Revista de Processo<\/em>, vol. 258. S\u00e3o Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, agosto de 2016, p. 185-202. ISSN 0100-1981. 83.1. Tamb\u00e9m publicado In: ALVIM, Teresa Arruda; DIDIER JR., Fredie (org.). Doutrinas essenciais Novo Processo Civil: precedentes, execu\u00e7\u00e3o e procedimentos especiais<\/em>, vol. VI. 2\u00aa edi\u00e7\u00e3o. S\u00e3o Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2018, p. 943-960. ISBN: 978-85-549-4748-4.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cCivil Justice in Brazil<\/em>\u201d<\/strong>. BRICS Law Journal<\/em>, vol. III, issue 4, 2016, p. 6-40 (em coautoria com Teresa Arruda Alvim Wambier). DOI: 10.21684\/2412-2343-2016-3-4-6-40. Acess\u00edvel em https:\/\/ssrn.com\/author=2657645<\/a>.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cPenhora on line <\/em>no novo C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil brasileiro\u201d<\/strong>. Publica\u00e7\u00f5es da Escola da AGU: Sistemi processuali a confronto: il nuovo Codice di Procedura Civile del Brasile tra tradizione e rinnovamento<\/em>. Bras\u00edlia: Escola da Advocacia-Geral da Uni\u00e3o Ministro Victor Nunes Leal, vol. 8, n. 1, janeiro\/mar\u00e7o de 2016, p. 75-92. ISSN: 2236-4374.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cReflex\u00f5es sobre o processo coletivo do consumidor a partir do CPC de 2015\u201d<\/strong>. Revista do Advogado: 25 anos do C\u00f3digo de Defesa do Consumidor: atualidades e desafios. Volume 139, ano XXXVI. S\u00e3o Paulo: Associa\u00e7\u00e3o dos Advogados, agosto de 2016, p. 32-37.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cTutela provis\u00f3ria no novo C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil e sua influ\u00eancia no processo do trabalho\u201d<\/strong>. Revista do Tribunal Regional do Trabalho da 2\u00aa Regi\u00e3o, vol. 18. S\u00e3o Paulo: Tribunal Regional do Trabalho da 2\u00aa Regi\u00e3o, 2016, p. 71-78. ISSN 1984-5448.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cOs honor\u00e1rios advocat\u00edcios e o Poder P\u00fablico em ju\u00edzo no CPC de 2015\u201d<\/strong>. Revista do Tribunal Regional Federal da 3\u00aa Regi\u00e3o: edi\u00e7\u00e3o especial sobre o novo C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil. Ano XXVII, n. 128. Janeiro\/mar\u00e7o de 2016, p. 25\/37. In: http:\/\/www.trf3.jus.br\/trf3r\/index.php?id=2561<\/a>.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cTechiniques coercitives civiles et mobilite humaines dans le droit processuel bresilien: avis pour une reflexion comparee<\/em>\u201d<\/strong>. Revista de Processo, vol. 248. S\u00e3o Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, outubro de 2015, p. 371\/412.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cAinda a \u2018revis\u00e3o\u2019 do texto do novo CPC\u201d<\/strong>. Em http:\/\/jota.info\/ainda-sobre-a-revisao-do-novo-cpc.<\/a> Publicado em 14 de mar\u00e7o de 2015.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cA \u2018revis\u00e3o\u2019 do texto do novo CPC\u201d<\/strong>. Em http:\/\/portalprocessual.com\/a-revisao-do-texto-do-novo-cpc-2\/<\/a>. Publicado em 19 de fevereiro de 2015.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201c(In)devido processo legislativo e o Novo C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil\u201d<\/strong>. Revista do Advogado, n\u00famero 126. Coordena\u00e7\u00e3o de Jos\u00e9 Rog\u00e9rio Cruz e Tucci e Heitor Vitor Mendon\u00e7a Sica. S\u00e3o Paulo: AASP, mar\u00e7o de 2015, p. 39\/46.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cVis\u00e3o geral do(s) Projeto(s) de novo C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil\u201d<\/strong>. Revista de Processo, vol. 235. S\u00e3o Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, setembro de 2014, p. 353\/378.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cIII Encontro do F\u00f3rum Permanente de Processualistas Civis \u2013 Carta do Rio\u201d<\/strong> (em coautoria com Fredie Didier Jr. e Ronaldo Cramer). Revista de Processo vol. 233. S\u00e3o Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, julho de 2014, p. 295\/325.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cCoisa julgada em mat\u00e9ria tribut\u00e1ria: reflex\u00f5es sobre a S\u00famula 239 do STF\u201d<\/strong> em Revista Tribut\u00e1ria das Am\u00e9ricas, ano 5, vol. 9. S\u00e3o Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, janeiro\/junho de 2014, p. 75\/102.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cJulgamento parcial na \u2018a\u00e7\u00e3o de improbidade administrativa\u2019\u201d<\/strong>. Revista de Direito Administrativo Contempor\u00e2neo, vol. 6. S\u00e3o Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, mar\u00e7o de 2014, p. 147\/156.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cII Encontro dos Jovens Processualistas do Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual (IBDP) \u2013 Carta de Salvador\u201d<\/strong> (em coautoria com Fredie Didier Jr. e Antonio Adonias Bastos). Revista de Processo vol. 227. S\u00e3o Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2014, p. 435\/452.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cAmicus curiae en el Derecho Procesal Civil Brasile\u00f1o: una presentaci\u00f3n<\/em>\u201d<\/strong>. Revista del Instituto Colombiano de Derecho Procesal, vol. 39. Bogot\u00e1, 2013, p. 95\/118.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cReflex\u00f5es a partir do novo art. 285-B do CPC\u201d<\/strong> em Revista de Processo vol. 223, setembro de 2013. S\u00e3o Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2013, p. 79\/85.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cAmicus curiae<\/em> e audi\u00eancias p\u00fablicas na jurisdi\u00e7\u00e3o constitucional: reflex\u00f5es de um processualista civil\u201d<\/strong>. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Constitucionais, RBEC \u2013 ano 6, n. 24 (out.\/dez. 2012). Belo Horizonte: F\u00f3rum, 2013, p. 1021\/1051.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cCusto unit\u00e1rio do processo de execu\u00e7\u00e3o fiscal na Justi\u00e7a Federal: breves observa\u00e7\u00f5es\u201d<\/strong>. Gest\u00e3o e Jurisdi\u00e7\u00e3o: o caso da execu\u00e7\u00e3o fiscal da Uni\u00e3o, vol. 9. Bras\u00edlia: IPEA, 2013, p. 19\/26. Coordena\u00e7\u00e3o e organiza\u00e7\u00e3o: Alexandre dos Santos Cunha e Paulo Eduardo Alves da Silva.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cTutela coletiva em ju\u00edzo: uma reflex\u00e3o sobre a altera\u00e7\u00e3o proposta para o art. 81, par\u00e1grafo \u00fanico, III, do CDC\u201d<\/strong>. Revista do Advogado \u2013 20 anos de vig\u00eancia do C\u00f3digo de Defesa do Consumidor \u2013 Desafios atuais. Ano XXXI, n. 114. S\u00e3o Paulo: Associa\u00e7\u00e3o dos Advogados de S\u00e3o Paulo, dezembro de 2011, p. 18\/30.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cAmicus curiae<\/em> no projeto de novo C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil\u201d<\/strong>. Revista de Informa\u00e7\u00e3o Legislativa n. 190 \u2013 Tomo I. Bras\u00edlia: Senado Federal\/Subsecretaria de Edi\u00e7\u00f5es T\u00e9cnicas, abril\/junho de 2011, p. 111\/121.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cRelat\u00f3rio apresentado \u00e0s XXII Jornadas Iberoamericanas de Derecho Procesal \u2013 Tutelas urgentes y cautela judicial\u201d<\/strong>. Revista de Processo vol. 190. S\u00e3o Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2010, p. 154\/196.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cA posi\u00e7\u00e3o do STJ quanto \u00e0 multa do art. 475-J (desnecessidade de intima\u00e7\u00e3o pessoal do devedor para cumprimento da senten\u00e7a) est\u00e1 em conson\u00e2ncia com o \u2018modelo constitucional do processo civil\u2019\u201d?.<\/strong> Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual vol. 64. Belo Horizonte: F\u00f3rum, outubro\/dezembro de 2009, p\u00e1ginas 204-207. O artigo analisa as diversas alternativas interpretativas do art. 475-J do C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil, inclusive aquela que acabou predominando no \u00e2mbito do Superior Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cUma nova lei para o mandado de seguran\u00e7a\u201d<\/strong>. Jornal Valor Econ\u00f4mico de 6 de maio de 2009. O texto faz um breve exame cr\u00edtico da nova lei do mandado de seguran\u00e7a (Lei n. 12.016\/2009) antes de sua promulga\u00e7\u00e3o, que s\u00f3 seu deu em agosto de 2009.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cQuatro perguntas e quatro respostas sobre o amicus curiae<\/em>\u201d<\/strong>. Revista Nacional da Magistratura Ano II, n. 5. Bras\u00edlia: Escola Nacional da Magistratura\/Associa\u00e7\u00e3o dos Magistrados Brasileiros, maio de 2008, p\u00e1ginas 132-138. O artigo faz uma breve apresenta\u00e7\u00e3o do instituto do amicus curiae demonstrando a possibilidade de sua ampla aplica\u00e7\u00e3o pr\u00e1tica mesmo sem pr\u00e9via disciplina legal.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201c\u2018O modelo constitucional do direito processual civil\u2019: um paradigma necess\u00e1rio de estudo do direito processual civil e algumas de suas implica\u00e7\u00f5es\u201d<\/strong>. Revista de Processo vol. 161. S\u00e3o Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, julho de 2008, p\u00e1ginas 261-270. Tamb\u00e9m publicado em Caderno de Direito Processual Civil: m\u00f3dulo 7. Porto Alegre: TRF \u2013 4a Regi\u00e3o, 2009, p\u00e1ginas 131-144. O trabalho, suma da palestra proferida pelo autor nas Jornadas Brasileiras de Direito Processual de 2008, realizadas em Florian\u00f3polis, destaca as t\u00e3o variadas quanto importantes aplica\u00e7\u00f5es do estudo do direito processual civil a partir da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o Federal.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cExecu\u00e7\u00e3o provis\u00f3ria: a cau\u00e7\u00e3o e sua dispensa na Lei n. 11.232\/2005\u201d.<\/strong> Revista do Advogado. S\u00e3o Paulo: Associa\u00e7\u00e3o dos Advogados de S\u00e3o Paulo, 2006. n. 85. (p\u00e1ginas 44\/56). O texto se volta-se ao exame de uma das mais importantes novidades trazidas pela Lei n. 11.232\/2005 para o C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil: a possibilidade de a cau\u00e7\u00e3o ser dispensada viabilizando uma execu\u00e7\u00e3o provis\u00f3ria verdadeiramente satisfativa para o exeq\u00fcente.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cA ultra-atividade da suspens\u00e3o de seguran\u00e7a e a s\u00famula 626 do STF\u201d.<\/strong> Revista Direito em Foco \u2013 Processo Civil. Janeiro 2006, ano 1, n\u00ba 02. Editora \u00cdmpetus, pp. 15\/20. O trabalho analisa a S\u00famula 626 do Supremo Tribunal Federal, criticando o entendimento, sustentando por muitos, de que ela agasalharia, indiscriminadamente, a tese da \u201cultra-atividade\u201d da suspens\u00e3o de seguran\u00e7a.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cAmicus curiae<\/em>\u201d.<\/strong> www.saraivajur.com.br<\/a>. O trabalho quer dar not\u00edcia suficiente de como deve ser compreendida a figura do amicus curiae no direito processual civil brasileiro, dando exemplos de sua atua\u00e7\u00e3o e de seu modo de atua\u00e7\u00e3o no plano do processo.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cPrimeiras notas do cumprimento das senten\u00e7as (Lei n. 11.232\/2005)\u201d<\/strong>. www.saraivajur.com.br<\/a>. Trata-se de breve not\u00edcia das profundas altera\u00e7\u00f5es promovidas pela Lei n. 11.232\/2005 no C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil, com especial destaque \u00e0 disciplina que passou a constar dos arts. 475-I a 475-R, isto \u00e9, do Cap\u00edtulo X do T\u00edtulo VIII do Livro I do C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cOs princ\u00edpios do processo civil transnacional e o C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil brasileiro: uma primeira aproxima\u00e7\u00e3o\u201d<\/strong> \u2013 Revista de Processo vol. 122 (abril de 2005), S\u00e3o Paulo, 2005, pp. 167\/186. A convite do Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual, escrevi um breve artigo propondo uma leitura conjunta entre os \u201cPrinciples and Rules\u201d do \u201cTransnational Civil Procedure\u201d \u2014 uma esp\u00e9cie de \u201cC\u00f3digo-modelo\u201d ou \u201cC\u00f3digo-tipo\u201d sugerido pelo American Law Institute e pela Unidroit (Institut International pour l\u2019Unification du Droit Priv\u00e9) para as rela\u00e7\u00f5es do com\u00e9rcio transnacional \u2014 e as principais diretrizes do C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cPrinciples and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure and Brazilian Civil Procedure Compared: a first assesment<\/em>\u201d<\/strong> \u2013 Uniform Law Review (revue de droit uniforme) vol. IX, 2004-4, pp. 859\/874. O trabalho \u00e9 a vers\u00e3o para o ingl\u00eas do trabalho descrito no n. 54, infra.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cA a\u00e7\u00e3o civil p\u00fablica e o poder p\u00fablico\u201d<\/strong> \u2013 Universit\u00e1ria: Revista do Curso de Mestrado em Direito das Faculdades Integradas Toledo de Ara\u00e7atuba, vol. 4, n. 1, Editora da Universidade, Ara\u00e7atuba, julho de 2004, pp. 81\/106. O trabalho \u00e9 o mesmo que foi publicado como cap\u00edtulo de livro (v. n. 18 da letra \u201cB\u201d, supra).<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cA\u00e7\u00e3o civil p\u00fablica e estatuto da cidade\u201d<\/strong> \u2013 Universit\u00e1ria: Revista do Curso de Mestrado em Direito das Faculdades Integradas Toledo de Ara\u00e7atuba, vol. 4, n. 1, Editora da Universidade, Ara\u00e7atuba, julho de 2004, pp. 5\/24. O trabalho \u00e9 o mesmo que foi publicado como cap\u00edtulo de livro (v. n. 20 da letra \u201cB\u201d, supra).<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cEnsaio sobre o cumprimento das senten\u00e7as condenat\u00f3rias\u201d<\/strong> \u2013 Revista de Processo vol. 113 (janeiro\/fevereiro de 2004), Editora Revista dos Tribunais, S\u00e3o Paulo, pp. 22\/76. Fruto da palestra que proferi nas V Jornadas de Direito Processual Civil de 2003, o trabalho volta-se \u00e0 demonstra\u00e7\u00e3o de que o conceito de \u201cexecu\u00e7\u00e3o\u201d deve ser necessariamente ampliado para qualquer forma de realiza\u00e7\u00e3o concreta das mais variadas decis\u00f5es jurisdicionais, forte no \u201cmodelo constitucional do processo\u201d. Nele s\u00e3o feitas tamb\u00e9m an\u00e1lises t\u00f3picas sobre os ent\u00e3o anteprojetos que alteram profundamente a execu\u00e7\u00e3o de senten\u00e7as e de t\u00edtulos executivos extrajudiciais, que acabaram por se converter nas Leis n. 11.232\/2005 e 11.382\/2006. O trabalho foi republicado como cap\u00edtulo de livro (v. n. 36 da letra \u201cB\u201d, supra) e como ap\u00eandice do livro A nova etapa da reforma do C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil, vol. 1 (v. n. 7 da letra \u201cA\u201d, supra).<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cDireito, interpreta\u00e7\u00e3o e norma jur\u00eddica: uma aproxima\u00e7\u00e3o musical do direito\u201d<\/strong> \u2013 Revista de Processo vol. 111 (julho\/setembro de 2003), Editora Revista dos Tribunais, S\u00e3o Paulo, 2003, pp. 223\/242. O trabalho faz uma breve incurs\u00e3o em um dos mais palpitantes temas da Teoria Geral do Direito, a interpreta\u00e7\u00e3o das normas jur\u00eddicas. Valendo-se do paradigma da interpreta\u00e7\u00e3o musical, o estudo volta-se \u00e0 verifica\u00e7\u00e3o da possibilidade de identifica\u00e7\u00e3o de \u201cparadigmas interpretativos\u201d e de sua relatividade em fun\u00e7\u00e3o da pr\u00f3pria maleabilidade da norma jur\u00eddica.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cHonor\u00e1rios de advogado, execu\u00e7\u00f5es n\u00e3o embargadas e a Fazenda P\u00fablica (estudo sobre o art. 1\u00ba-D da Lei 9.494\/97)\u201d<\/strong> \u2013 Revista Dial\u00e9tica de Direito Processual vol. 8, Editora Dial\u00e9tica, S\u00e3o Paulo, 2003, pp. 9\/23. O estudo \u00e9 voltado especificamente a uma das tantas novidades incorporadas ao \u201cdireito processual p\u00fablico\u201d pela Medida Provis\u00f3ria n. 2.180-35\/2001. Nesta oportunidade, a an\u00e1lise \u00e9 a do dispositivo segundo o qual nas execu\u00e7\u00f5es n\u00e3o embargadas contra a Fazenda n\u00e3o devem ser arbitrados honor\u00e1rios de advogado. O trabalho pretende discutir os sentidos daquela regra e analisar a crescente jurisprud\u00eancia do STJ e sua tend\u00eancia de afastar sua incid\u00eancia pelo menos das execu\u00e7\u00f5es pendentes \u00e0 \u00e9poca da edi\u00e7\u00e3o da referida medida provis\u00f3ria.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cO agravo interno e o indeferimento da suspens\u00e3o de seguran\u00e7a – o cancelamento da S\u00famula 506 do STF: notas para uma primeira reflex\u00e3o\u201d<\/strong> \u2013 Revista Dial\u00e9tica de Direito Processual, vol. 3, Editora Dial\u00e9tica, S\u00e3o Paulo, 2003, pp. 9\/24. O trabalho dedica-se \u00e0 discuss\u00e3o do art. 4o, caput, da Lei n. 4.348\/1964, que s\u00f3 admite o agravo da decis\u00e3o do Presidente do Tribunal que concede a suspens\u00e3o de seguran\u00e7a. Aquele entendimento, amplamente acolhido em doutrina e jurisprud\u00eancia (maior prova, as S\u00famulas 506, do STF, e 217, do STJ), foi modificado pelo Plen\u00e1rio do STF, que pugnou pela revoga\u00e7\u00e3o de sua S\u00famula em fun\u00e7\u00e3o das novidades que, por causa da Medida Provis\u00f3ria n. 2.180-35\/2001, foram incorporadas ao instituto da suspens\u00e3o de seguran\u00e7a.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cAs (constantes) altera\u00e7\u00f5es impostas pela Medida Provis\u00f3ria n. 1.984, j\u00e1 n\u00e3o mais 2.102, mas 2.180, no processo civil: um adendo setembro de 2001\u201d<\/strong> em www.maxlimonad.com.br<\/a>, abril de 2002. Veja coment\u00e1rio ao n. 25, supra.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cO Poder P\u00fablico em Ju\u00edzo: uma proposta de sistematiza\u00e7\u00e3o\u201d<\/strong> em www.cpc.adv.br<\/a>, abril de 2002 e 45.1) Universit\u00e1ria: Revista do curso de mestrado em Direito das Faculdades Integradas Toledo, vol. 2, n. 1, Ara\u00e7atuba, 2001, pp. 53\/108. O texto reproduz, com acr\u00e9scimos e atualiza\u00e7\u00f5es a palestra que proferi nas IV Jornadas de Direito Processual Civil, que se realizaram no m\u00eas de agosto de 2001, em Fortaleza\/CE. Considerando ter sido palestra inaugural de um dos m\u00f3dulos do Evento, denominado \u201cO Poder P\u00fablico em Ju\u00edzo\u201d, procurei transmitir aos participantes o maior n\u00famero poss\u00edvel de informa\u00e7\u00f5es acerca da import\u00e2ncia e relev\u00e2ncia do corte metodol\u00f3gico que anunciei desde o meu trabalho \u201cO Poder P\u00fablico em Ju\u00edzo\u201d (v. n. 3 da letra \u201cA\u201d, supra).<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cQuem tem medo do prequestionamento?\u201d<\/strong> \u2013 Revista Dial\u00e9tica de Direito Processual, vol. 1, S\u00e3o Paulo, Dial\u00e9tica, 2003, pp. 23\/53; 44.1) em www.cpc.adv.br<\/a>; em 44.2) www.saraivajur.com.br<\/a> e em 44.3) www.direitoprocessual.org.br<\/a>. Texto que se pretende bastante cr\u00edtico acerca de um dos temas mais pol\u00eamicos que dizem respeito aos recursos extraordin\u00e1rio e especial: o preq\u00fcestionamento. O trabalho volta-se \u00e0 exposi\u00e7\u00e3o das diversas defini\u00e7\u00f5es, correntes e entendimentos sobre o tema, assim como, \u00e0 pesquisa em torno de sua previs\u00e3o constitucional. Nas suas conclus\u00f5es, pergunta-se acerca do papel do Supremo Tribunal Federal, guardi\u00e3o m\u00e1ximo da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o diante da S\u00famula 211 do Superior Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a, respons\u00e1vel por uma \u201cnova\u201d \u2014 ou, quando menos, diversa daquela que, por d\u00e9cadas, imperou na jurisprud\u00eancia do Supremo Tribunal Federal \u2014 orienta\u00e7\u00e3o sobre o \u201cpreq\u00fcestionamento\u201d.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cInconstitucionalidade das novas regras da suspens\u00e3o de liminar em mandado de seguran\u00e7a\u201d<\/strong> em 50 anos da lei do mandado de seguran\u00e7a – Revista do Advogado n. 64, Associa\u00e7\u00e3o dos Advogados de S\u00e3o Paulo, S\u00e3o Paulo, outubro de 2001, pp. 20\/33. O texto \u00e9 o desenvolvimento e a atualiza\u00e7\u00e3o daquele descrito no n. 30, supra. Foi motivado, fundamentalmente, porque a Medida Provis\u00f3ria n. 2.059\/2000, ent\u00e3o comentada, acabou sendo incorporada por outra, que se transformou na Medida Provis\u00f3ria n. 2.180-35, de 24 de agosto de 2001.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cAs constantes altera\u00e7\u00f5es impostas pela Medida Provis\u00f3ria n. 2.102, j\u00e1 n\u00e3o mais 1.984 nem 2.102, no processo civil: um adendo para julho e agosto de 2001\u201d<\/strong> em www.maxlimonad.com.br, agosto de 2001. Veja coment\u00e1rio ao n. 25, supra.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cAs constantes altera\u00e7\u00f5es impostas pela Medida Provis\u00f3ria n. 1.984 \u2014 doravante 2.102 \u2014 no processo civil: um adendo para junho e julho de 2001\u201d<\/strong> em www.maxlimonad.com.br, julho de 2001. Veja coment\u00e1rio ao n. 25, supra.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cAs constantes altera\u00e7\u00f5es impostas pela Medida Provis\u00f3ria n. 1.984 \u2014 doravante 2.102 \u2014 no processo civil: um adendo para abril e maio de 2001\u201d<\/strong> em www.maxlimonad.com.br, maio de 2001. Veja coment\u00e1rio ao n. 25, supra.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cAs constantes altera\u00e7\u00f5es impostas pela Medida Provis\u00f3ria n. 1.984 \u2014 doravante 2.102 \u2014 no processo civil: um adendo para mar\u00e7o e abril de 2001\u201d<\/strong> em www.maxlimonad.com.br, fevereiro de 2001. Veja coment\u00e1rio ao n. 25, supra.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cUm atentado contra a Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o\u201d em Littera \u2013 Informativo do Escrit\u00f3rio Manesco, Ramires, Perez e Azevedo Marques Advocacia, n. 1, fevereiro de 2001, p. 2. (com Marcos Augusto Perez)<\/strong>. A exemplo do trabalho comentado no n. 24, supra, o artigo quer chamar a aten\u00e7\u00e3o para as diversas reformas que o processo civil sofreu por medidas provis\u00f3rias. Em especial na derroga\u00e7\u00e3o de regras destinadas aos processos em que as fazendas p\u00fablicas s\u00e3o partes.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cAs constantes altera\u00e7\u00f5es impostas pela Medida Provis\u00f3ria n. 1.984 \u2014 doravante 2.102 \u2014 no processo civil: um adendo para fevereiro de 2001\u201d<\/strong> em www.maxlimonad.com.br, fevereiro de 2001. Veja coment\u00e1rio ao n. 25, supra.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cAs constantes altera\u00e7\u00f5es impostas pela Medida Provis\u00f3ria n. 1.984 \u2014 doravante 2.102 \u2014 no processo civil: um adendo para janeiro de 2001\u201d<\/strong> em www.maxlimonad.com.br, janeiro de 2001. Veja coment\u00e1rio ao n. 25, supra.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cAs constantes altera\u00e7\u00f5es impostas pela Medida Provis\u00f3ria n. 1.984 no processo civil: um adendo para novembro\/dezembro de 2000\u201d<\/strong> em www.maxlimonad.com.br, novembro de 2000. Veja coment\u00e1rio ao n. 25, supra.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cAs constantes altera\u00e7\u00f5es impostas pela Medida Provis\u00f3ria n. 1.984 no processo civil: um adendo para novembro de 2000\u201d<\/strong> em www.maxlimonad.com.br, novembro de 2000. Veja coment\u00e1rio ao n. 25, supra.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cA\u00e7\u00e3o civil p\u00fablica: um duro golpe\u201d<\/strong> em Consumidor S\/A, S\u00e3o Paulo, SP, outubro de 2000.. O artigo \u00e9 redu\u00e7\u00e3o daquele comentado no n. 28, supra.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cDepend\u00eancia e morte: a Medida Provis\u00f3ria n. 2.059, de 08.09.00\u201d<\/strong> \u2013 Informativo do Instituto dos Advogados de S\u00e3o Paulo, n. 47, outubro de 2000, p. 8. O artigo \u00e9 redu\u00e7\u00e3o daquele comentado no n. 30, supra.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

As constantes altera\u00e7\u00f5es impostas pela Medida Provis\u00f3ria n. 1.984 no processo civil: um adendo para outubro de 2000\u201d<\/strong> em www.maxlimonad.com.br, outubro de 2000. Veja coment\u00e1rio ao n. 25, supra.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cDepend\u00eancia e morte: A Medida Provis\u00f3ria 2.059, de 8.9.00, o novo pedido de suspens\u00e3o e o mandado de seguran\u00e7a\u201d<\/strong> em www.sbdp.org.br e em www.maxlimonad.com.br, setembro de 2000. O texto segue o mesmo contexto das diversas atualiza\u00e7\u00f5es de \u201cO Poder P\u00fablico em Ju\u00edzo\u201d (v. n. 25, supra). A Medida Provis\u00f3ria n. 2.059\/2000 trouxe profundas inova\u00e7\u00f5es para o sistema da suspens\u00e3o de seguran\u00e7a da liminar em mandado de seguran\u00e7a (art. 4\u00ba da Lei n. 4.348\/64), cuja sistematiza\u00e7\u00e3o \u00e9 buscada pelo trabalho. Al\u00e9m disto, o artigo volta-se a questionar a raz\u00e3o de a precitada Lei n. 4.348\/64 ter sido alterada por Medida Provis\u00f3ria que foi publicada em edi\u00e7\u00e3o extra do Di\u00e1rio Oficial de um domingo.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cAs constantes altera\u00e7\u00f5es impostas pela Medida Provis\u00f3ria n. 1.984 no processo civil: um adendo para setembro de 2000\u201d<\/strong> em www.maxlimonad.com.br, setembro de 2000. Veja coment\u00e1rio ao n. 25, supra.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cR\u00e9quiem para a a\u00e7\u00e3o civil p\u00fablica\u201d<\/strong> em Boletim dos Procuradores da Rep\u00fablica n. 31, S\u00e3o Paulo, novembro de 2000, pp. 3\/11; em 28.1) www.sbdp.org.br<\/a> e em 28.2) www.saraivajur.com.br<\/a>. Este texto \u00e9 o mesmo que foi publicado, posteriormente, em livro (v. coment\u00e1rios ao n. 15 da letra \u201cB\u201d, supra).<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cAs constantes altera\u00e7\u00f5es impostas pela Medida Provis\u00f3ria n. 1.984 no processo civil: um adendo para agosto de 2000\u201d<\/strong> em www.maxlimonad.com.br, agosto de 2000. Veja coment\u00e1rio ao n. 25, supra.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cAs constantes altera\u00e7\u00f5es impostas pela Medida Provis\u00f3ria n. 1.984 no processo civil: um adendo para julho de 2000\u201d<\/strong> em www.maxlimonad.com.br, julho de 2000. Veja coment\u00e1rio ao n. 25, supra.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cAs constantes altera\u00e7\u00f5es impostas pela Medida Provis\u00f3ria n. 1.984 no processo civil: um adendo para junho de 2000\u201d<\/strong> em www.maxlimonad.com.br, junho de 2000. O meu livro \u201cO Poder P\u00fablico em Ju\u00edzo\u201d (v. n. 3 da letra \u201cA\u201d, supra) voltou-se, fundamentalmente, a comentar uma Medida Provis\u00f3ria. Como a Medida Provis\u00f3ria continuou sendo reeditada m\u00eas a m\u00eas, propus-me, t\u00e3o logo o livro foi editado, a atualizar seu texto de acordo com cada uma das novas vers\u00f5es daquele ato presidencial. A iniciativa pareceu-me bastante v\u00e1lida porque, a par de ter sido uma iniciativa pioneira \u2014 o livro foi atualizado mensal e gratuitamente pelo site da editora Max Limonad \u2014, seu resultado acabou por demonstrar o acerto da principal premissa sobre a qual se baseia aquele trabalho: a altera\u00e7\u00e3o interessada do ordenamento jur\u00eddico para beneficiar as partes p\u00fablicas que litigam em ju\u00edzo.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cMedida Provis\u00f3ria de prote\u00e7\u00e3o a Poder P\u00fablico fere a Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o\u201d<\/strong> em Gazeta Mercantil, 15 de junho de 2000 (com Marcos Augusto Perez) e 24.1) Justi\u00e7a & Poder, n. 21, julho de 2000, S\u00e3o Paulo, pp. 66\/67, agosto de 2000. Desde a publica\u00e7\u00e3o de \u201cO Poder P\u00fablico em Ju\u00edzo\u201d desenvolvi uma s\u00e9rie de trabalhos a partir da premissa de que diversas das altera\u00e7\u00f5es experimentadas pelo sistema processual civil em virtude de edi\u00e7\u00f5es e reedi\u00e7\u00f5es de medidas provis\u00f3rias voltaram-se, \u00fanica e exclusivamente, para frustrar determinadas e concretas derrotas judiciais sentidas pela Uni\u00e3o Federal. Este breve artigo destina-se a demonstrar essa realidade.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cReforma processual e acesso \u00e0 Justi\u00e7a\u201d<\/strong> – Revista dos Tribunais vol. 772, S\u00e3o Paulo, Editora Revista dos Tribunais, fevereiro de 2000, pp. 79\/85. Fruto de palestra, este texto \u00e9 bastante cr\u00edtico buscando acentuar a desnecess\u00e1ria \u2018infla\u00e7\u00e3o\u2019 legislativa brasileira (a\u00ed inclu\u00eddas as medidas provis\u00f3rias) para solucionar diversos problemas verificados na condu\u00e7\u00e3o do Pa\u00eds, especificamente no que se refere ao tema das s\u00famulas vinculantes e da arrecada\u00e7\u00e3o tribut\u00e1ria.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cUma segunda reflex\u00e3o sobre o novo \u00a7 3\u00ba do art. 542, do CPC (Lei n. 9.756, de 17 de dezembro de 1998)\u201d<\/strong> \u2013 Revista de Processo vol. 97, S\u00e3o Paulo, Editora Revista dos Tribunais, janeiro\/mar\u00e7o de 2000, pp. 107\/134 e22.1) \u201cDoutrina jur\u00eddica brasileira\u201d, Cd-rom da editora Plenum, de Caxias do Sul, RS, 2001. Este trabalho \u00e9 um aprofundamento e uma proposta de sistematiza\u00e7\u00e3o de toda doutrina e jurisprud\u00eancia que se formaram em um ano de vig\u00eancia do \u00a7 3\u00ba do art. 542 do C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil, que criou a figura dos recursos extraordin\u00e1rio e especial retidos, a partir do trabalho mencionado no n. 8, supra.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cLiminar em mandado de seguran\u00e7a: uma nova varia\u00e7\u00e3o velha\u201d<\/strong> \u2013 Revista de Direito Processual Civil n. 14, Curitiba, Editora G\u00eanesis, 1999, pp. 653\/658. O trabalho busca descrever e questionar a constitucionalidade de uma das v\u00e1rias propostas de altera\u00e7\u00e3o constitucional e legal do sistema tribut\u00e1rio, qual seja, a relativa \u00e0 dura\u00e7\u00e3o preestabelecida das liminares concedidas contra o Poder P\u00fablico.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cAgravo de instrumento contra decis\u00f5es proferidas em mandado de seguran\u00e7a. Execu\u00e7\u00e3o provis\u00f3ria\u201d<\/strong> (coment\u00e1rio a ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o) – Revista de Processo n. 95, S\u00e3o Paulo, Editora Revista dos Tribunais, julho\/setembro de 1999, pp. 235\/243 (com Eduardo Arruda Alvim, em partes separadas).. Tema dos mais pol\u00eamicos a respeito do mandado de seguran\u00e7a diz respeito ao cabimento, ou n\u00e3o, do recurso de agravo de instrumento contra as decis\u00f5es que deferem ou que indeferem a medida liminar. Este estudo analisa e defende o cabimento do precitado recurso na hip\u00f3tese e, bem assim, procura identificar as situa\u00e7\u00f5es em que o ordenamento infraconstitucional veda a execu\u00e7\u00e3o provis\u00f3ria da senten\u00e7a concessiva do mandado de seguran\u00e7a e, em que medida, que esta proibi\u00e7\u00e3o agride os valores constitucionais incidentes sobre aquela a\u00e7\u00e3o.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cObserva\u00e7\u00f5es iniciais sobre o novo \u00a7 3\u00ba do art. 542 do CPC (Lei n. 9.756, de 17 de dezembro de 1998)\u201d<\/strong> – Revista de Processo n. 93, S\u00e3o Paulo, Editora Revista dos Tribunais, janeiro\/mar\u00e7o de 1999, pp. 17\/27. Movido pela pol\u00eamica cria\u00e7\u00e3o dos recursos especial e extraordin\u00e1rio retidos (CPC, art. 542, \u00a7 3\u00ba, na reda\u00e7\u00e3o da Lei n. 9.756\/98), busquei descrever uma proposta de interpreta\u00e7\u00e3o \u00e0quela forma de interposi\u00e7\u00e3o do recurso que n\u00e3o violasse o princ\u00edpio do amplo acesso \u00e0 justi\u00e7a garantido no art. 5\u00ba, XXXV, da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o Federal.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cAspectos pol\u00eamicos da produ\u00e7\u00e3o antecipada de provas\u201d<\/strong> (coment\u00e1rios a ac\u00f3rd\u00e3os) – Revista de Processo n. 91, S\u00e3o Paulo, Editora Revista dos Tribunais, julho\/setembro de 1998, pp. 320\/337. Fruto de pesquisas que realizei enquanto cursava o \u00faltimo cr\u00e9dito do Mestrado, este trabalho re\u00fane dois coment\u00e1rios a ac\u00f3rd\u00e3os que tratam da aplica\u00e7\u00e3o do contradit\u00f3rio e do devido processo legal na a\u00e7\u00e3o cautelar de produ\u00e7\u00e3o antecipada de provas, buscando examinar, notadamente, os efeitos que a prova colhida por aquela via, quando preparat\u00f3ria, gera na a\u00e7\u00e3o principal. A este trabalho cabem as mesmas considera\u00e7\u00f5es dos ns. 6, 7 e 17, supra.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cSenten\u00e7a proferida em processo sem cita\u00e7\u00e3o v\u00e1lida – Inexist\u00eancia jur\u00eddica – Aus\u00eancia de coisa julgada\u201d<\/strong> (coment\u00e1rio a ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o) – Revista de Processo n. 88, S\u00e3o Paulo, Editora Revista dos Tribunais, outubro\/dezembro de 1997, pp. 308\/319. S\u00e3o pertinentes as mesmas considera\u00e7\u00f5es que j\u00e1 lancei quanto aos trabalhos mencionados nos ns. 6 e 7, supra. Trata-se da an\u00e1lise de um ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o do Superior Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a que nega exist\u00eancia jur\u00eddica a processos em que n\u00e3o tenha ocorrido cita\u00e7\u00e3o v\u00e1lida.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cA legitimidade ativa no mandado de seguran\u00e7a coletivo (CF\/88, art. 5\u00ba, LXX)\u201d<\/strong> – Revista de Processo n. 88, S\u00e3o Paulo, Editora Revista dos Tribunais, outubro\/dezembro de 1997, pp. 185\/207. Este trabalho \u00e9 resultado de uma revis\u00e3o, sistematiza\u00e7\u00e3o e atualiza\u00e7\u00e3o de monografia apresentada no curso de P\u00f3s-gradua\u00e7\u00e3o da PUCSP e representa a s\u00edntese de minhas pesquisas e conclus\u00f5es sobre as a\u00e7\u00f5es coletivas no direito constitucional\/processual brasileiro. Forte na experi\u00eancia do direito comparado (v. n. 11, supra), a minha convic\u00e7\u00e3o sobre muitos dos temas usualmente abordados pela doutrina \u00e9 mais restritiva, exigindo como condi\u00e7\u00e3o de propositura da a\u00e7\u00e3o coletiva a demonstra\u00e7\u00e3o, pelo autor, de uma vincula\u00e7\u00e3o entre o objeto da a\u00e7\u00e3o (o que se pretende com sua investida judicial) e suas finalidades institucionais.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cEfeitos de liminar concedida em a\u00e7\u00e3o direta de inconstitucionalidade e Recurso Especial\u201d<\/strong> – Revista de Processo n. 86, S\u00e3o Paulo, Ed. Revista dos Tribunais, abril\/junho de 1997, pp. 333\/349. Derivado de debates de que participei em palestra realizada na Faculdade de Direito de Curitiba, o estudo volta-se a uma das grandes preocupa\u00e7\u00f5es institucionais que tem emprestado for\u00e7a \u00e0s \u2018s\u00famulas vinculantes\u2019: qual a consequ\u00eancia jur\u00eddica de uma lei considerada inconstitucional pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal em liminar proferida em a\u00e7\u00e3o direta de inconstitucionalidade? O que deve acontecer com os processos em curso em que se questiona, precisamente, a aplica\u00e7\u00e3o daquela norma? \u00c0 resposta destas quest\u00f5es e a outras delas derivadas, \u00e9 que se volta o estudo.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cDuas \u2018novidades\u2019 em torno dos recursos extraordin\u00e1rios em sentido lato\u201d<\/strong> – Revista de Processo n. 84, S\u00e3o Paulo, Ed. Revista dos Tribunais, outubro\/dezembro de 1996, pp. 200\/235. A exemplo do que procurei fazer no trabalho que escrevi a respeito do art. 103, IX, da CF\/88 (item 5, supra), analisei criticamente duas correntes que come\u00e7avam a se formar no Supremo Tribunal Federal e no Superior Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a e que, em \u00faltima an\u00e1lise, estreitavam a via dos recursos extraordin\u00e1rios e especiais dirigidos \u00e0quelas Cortes.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cA lei pode restringir a concess\u00e3o de liminares? – Breve enfoque a partir do mandado de seguran\u00e7a\u201d<\/strong> – Boletim de Direito Administrativo n. 3, S\u00e3o Paulo, Editora NDJ, mar\u00e7o de 1997, pp. 166\/178. A exemplo do que j\u00e1 havia me chamado a aten\u00e7\u00e3o anteriormente (v. n. 4 da letra \u201cA\u201d, supra), o Poder Executivo e o Poder Legislativo sempre procuraram minimizar a efic\u00e1cia das a\u00e7\u00f5es propostas contra o Governo, pela edi\u00e7\u00e3o de leis e medidas provis\u00f3rias restringindo a concess\u00e3o de liminares ou, ainda, exigindo o pr\u00e9vio tr\u00e2nsito em julgado como condi\u00e7\u00e3o para dar in\u00edcio \u00e0 execu\u00e7\u00e3o de senten\u00e7a favor\u00e1vel. \u00c9 um trabalho cr\u00edtico voltado a identificar o desenvolvimento hist\u00f3rico desta verdadeira tend\u00eancia e indicar a n\u00e3o recep\u00e7\u00e3o\/inconstitucionalidade destas normas pela Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o Federal de 1988, tendo presente a amplitude a que ao princ\u00edpio da inafastabilidade ao controle jurisdicional foi dado pelo legislador constituinte (inciso XXXV do art. 5\u00ba, que se refere a \u2018amea\u00e7a\u2019 a direito e n\u00e3o s\u00f3, como nas Cartas anteriores, a \u2018les\u00e3o\u2019).<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cTutela cautelar no sistema recursal do C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil modificado\u201d<\/strong> – Revista de Processo n. 83, S\u00e3o Paulo, Editora Revista dos Tribunais, julho\/setembro de 1996, pp. 27\/43 (com Berenice Soubhie Nogueira Magri); 12.1) Jurisprud\u00eancia dos Tribunais de Al\u00e7ada Civil de S\u00e3o Paulo, S\u00e3o Paulo, ed. Lex, vol. 163, maio\/junho de 1997, pp. 6\/27 e 12.2) Jurisprud\u00eancia Brasileira vol. 179 – A\u00e7\u00e3o Rescis\u00f3ria II, Curitiba, Juru\u00e1 Editora, 1997, pp. 23\/38. As profundas reformas empreendidas em 1994 e em 1995 no C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil incentivaram diversos autores a escrever sobre pontos que lhe pareceram de relevo. Minhas principais preocupa\u00e7\u00f5es a respeito do tema sempre foram com a sistematiza\u00e7\u00e3o destas reformas com os dispositivos legais constantes originalmente do C\u00f3digo de 1973, buscando, com isto, um funcionamento eficaz do sistema recursal. Este artigo trata de uma proposta de sistematiza\u00e7\u00e3o, buscando colmatar as lacunas sempre referidas em doutrina e jurisprud\u00eancia nas leis processuais civis, preenchidas, usualmente, com a utiliza\u00e7\u00e3o an\u00f4mala do mandado de seguran\u00e7a contra ato judicial.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cAs Class Actions<\/em> do Direito Norte-Americano e as A\u00e7\u00f5es Coletivas Brasileiras: Pontos para uma reflex\u00e3o conjunta\u201d<\/strong> – Revista de Processo n. 82, S\u00e3o Paulo, Ed. Revista dos Tribunais, abril\/junho de 1996, pp. 92\/151. Este trabalho, associado ao referido no n. 16, infra, que s\u00f3 veio a ser publicado posteriormente, foi o culminante das minhas pesquisas sobre a\u00e7\u00f5es coletivas. Seu enfoque \u00e9 bastante cr\u00edtico ao modelo adotado pelo legislador brasileiro a partir da experi\u00eancia norte-americana das class actions<\/em>.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][divider line_type=”Small Line” line_alignment=”center” line_thickness=”1″ divider_color=”default”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” bottom_padding=”1%” text_align=”left” row_position=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” pointer_events=”all”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” overflow=”visible” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”][vc_column_text css=”” text_direction=”default”]\n

\u201cO Minist\u00e9rio P\u00fablico \u00e9 Parte Leg\u00edtima para Defesa do Er\u00e1rio Municipal?\u201d<\/strong> (coment\u00e1rio a ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o) – Boletim de Direito Municipal n. 07, S\u00e3o Paulo, Editora NDJ, julho de 1996, pp. 401\/405. Mais um trabalho motivado pelos estudos que estava realizando no curso de P\u00f3s-gradua\u00e7\u00e3o sobre a\u00e7\u00f5es coletivas. Desta vez a preocupa\u00e7\u00e3o era a legitimidade do Minist\u00e9rio P\u00fablico para ajuizar a\u00e7\u00f5es civis p\u00fablicas com objetivos s\u00edmiles \u00e0queles perseguidos nas a\u00e7\u00f5es populares: invalida\u00e7\u00e3o de ato administrativo ilegal e lesivo ao er\u00e1rio.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row type=”full_width_background” full_screen_row_position=”middle” column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” scene_position=”center” top_padding=”70″ bottom_padding=”30″ text_color=”dark” text_align=”left” row_border_radius=”none” row_border_radius_applies=”bg” row_position_desktop=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” overlay_strength=”0.3″ gradient_direction=”left_to_right” shape_divider_position=”bottom” bg_image_animation=”none” gradient_type=”default” shape_type=””][vc_column column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default” column_element_spacing=”default” desktop_text_alignment=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_backdrop_filter=”none” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” column_position=”default” gradient_direction=”left_to_right” overlay_strength=”0.3″ width=”1\/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” animation_type=”default” bg_image_animation=”none” border_type=”simple” column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid”]

<\/i> Share<\/span>
<\/i> <\/i>
<\/i>Love<\/span>0<\/span><\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div>[\/vc_column][\/vc_row]\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[vc_row type=”full_width_background” full_screen_row_position=”middle” column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” scene_position=”center” top_padding=”30″ bottom_padding=”0″ text_color=”dark” text_align=”left” row_border_radius=”none” row_border_radius_applies=”bg” row_position_desktop=”default” row_position_tablet=”inherit” row_position_phone=”inherit” overflow=”visible” overlay_strength=”0.3″ gradient_direction=”left_to_right” shape_divider_position=”bottom” bg_image_animation=”none” gradient_type=”default” shape_type=””][vc_column column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_tablet=”inherit” column_padding_phone=”inherit” column_padding_position=”all” flex_gap_desktop=”10px” column_element_direction_desktop=”default”…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-6836","page","type-page","status-publish"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lumyna.com.br\/scarpinella2026\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6836","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lumyna.com.br\/scarpinella2026\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lumyna.com.br\/scarpinella2026\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lumyna.com.br\/scarpinella2026\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lumyna.com.br\/scarpinella2026\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6836"}],"version-history":[{"count":95,"href":"https:\/\/lumyna.com.br\/scarpinella2026\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6836\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7253,"href":"https:\/\/lumyna.com.br\/scarpinella2026\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6836\/revisions\/7253"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lumyna.com.br\/scarpinella2026\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6836"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}